It also does a good job in making the viewer think and analyze situations. In that respects it does a very nice job. Going back to the documentary, 'The Shock Doctrine' presents its ideas in a very clear and easy to understand way, and it gives enough examples to see why they say what they say. But that's for a politics or international relations class. Even if you don't believe that happens on purpose, it is true that systems, being it capitalism or other, may take advantage of those situations. Does it all sound a little bit conspiratorial? It does, but it is also true that when something like a war happens, people's attention will be centered on that event, and it will become a situation of 'us' vs.

For example, it talks about how the United Kingdom got into the Falklands War, and how that distracted public attention from the strikes and the civil unrest that was ongoing in the country. Basically the movie talks about how capitalism aliments itself on conflict and shocks, meaning that it is very good at distracting the attention from the important to some event that is terrible, but not the most terrible. Aristotle said that 'It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.' Well, going back to the start of the review, even if you think that what Naomi Klein is talking about is pure nonsense, 'The Shock Doctrine' is a movie to watch, precisely even more if you don't agree with the ideas it presents.

The shock doctrine by naomi klein